Response: It possible data might possibly be interesting, needless to say, but not for our browse concern. If for example the customer takes into account which our analyses commonly suited to answer all of our search matter (never to almost every other probably fascinating browse inquiries), we want to look for an obvious malfunction of them suggested analyses and you will a reason for them. Given that this new reviewer has not justified this point and has now only discussed just what the guy/she’d like to see or would have carried out by themselves/herself, is you don’t need to accomplish that. The goals of our manuscript are obvious; not biggercity especially challenging, but clear: examine pages and you will nonusers when you look at the mating orientations. This new suggested data is not the one to needed to just be sure to promote an answer to the search matter.
Out of a mathematical viewpoint, it has been recognized for a very long time one dichotomizing details isn’t good practice (Cohen, 1983).
This new SOI-Roentgen performed statement differences when considering folk (expected). Yet on the displayed regression (desk dos) the outcome is actually unexpected into the Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). Why does? Why does which look in the complete model?
Response: Once more, we have had issues to totally understand the opinion. Ergo, we do not manage people change out of this issue. Lire la suite